← Back to the atlas CATALOGUE REPRESENTATION 317 Authentic glyph asset not available
SIGN RECORD / ICIT S317
A mark.Many contexts. Contextual only · literal meaning unresolved
opening slot The five-slot model favors this functional role hypothesis. Its 50.6% model mass is a preference within the model, not a probability that an ancient meaning is correct.
7 occurrences / 9,311 deduplicated tokens
#163 frequency rank · ties by ID
8 0.06% of 12,910 analytic tokens
75.0% bootstrap stability / 24 refits
Where it appears 0 — 100%
beginning 57.14%
4 of 7 non-solo occurrences middle 0.00%
0 of 7 non-solo occurrences end 42.86%
3 of 7 non-solo occurrences 0 solo occurrences excluded from positional rates. Exact strings deduplicated. Five possible roles 0 — 100%
Sign-level model mass, normalized to one. No gold-standard semantic labels exist. All five alternatives are shown. The published 90% credible sets are occurrence-level; inspect the token records below rather than treating a sign-level score as a contextual credible set.
Common left neighbors Adjacent pairs in deduplicated strings, normalized order.
Common right neighbors Adjacent pairs in deduplicated strings, normalized order.
Across objects and sites 8 distinct artifacts across 4 recorded sites. Counts below are analytic lines containing this sign; repeated inscriptions remain included.
Sites Harappa 4 lines
Mohenjo-daro 2 lines
Chanhu-daro 1 lines
Lothal 1 lines
Artifact types SEAL:S 4 lines
TAB:B 3 lines
TAG:P 1 lines
In the inscription First 8 matching analytic lines in catalogue order. These are examples, not a representative sample.
C-3 / line 1 ↗ Chanhu-daro · SEAL:S · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 016 016 measure associated · 45.4% 90% set: measure associated / core slot / quantity like ICIT / 740 740 closing slot · 73.9% 90% set: closing slot / core slot H-2016 / line 1 ↗ Harappa · TAB:B · 2 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 176 176 measure associated · 50.6% 90% set: measure associated / core slot ICIT / 740 740 closing slot · 61.1% 90% set: closing slot / core slot ICIT / 335 335 closing slot · 52.9% 90% set: closing slot / core slot H-1840 / line 1 ↗ Harappa · TAB:B · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 317 317 opening slot · 89.5% 90% set: opening slot / core slot ICIT / 272 272 opening slot · 56.1% 90% set: opening slot / core slot / measure associated H-6 / line 1 ↗ Harappa · SEAL:S · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 625 625 opening slot · 84.8% 90% set: opening slot / core slot ICIT / 776 776 opening slot · 42.2% 90% set: opening slot / quantity like / core slot ICIT / 890 890 measure associated · 53.7% 90% set: measure associated / core slot ICIT / 317 317 closing slot · 80.0% 90% set: closing slot / core slot H-811 / line 1 ↗ Harappa · TAB:B · 2 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 176 176 measure associated · 50.6% 90% set: measure associated / core slot ICIT / 740 740 closing slot · 61.1% 90% set: closing slot / core slot ICIT / 335 335 closing slot · 52.9% 90% set: closing slot / core slot L-218 / line 1 ↗ Lothal · TAG:P · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 111 111 core slot · 54.4% 90% set: core slot / opening slot / measure associated ICIT / 590 590 core slot · 75.7% 90% set: core slot / measure associated / closing slot ICIT / 317 317 closing slot · 79.7% 90% set: closing slot / core slot M-44 / line 1 ↗ Mohenjo-daro · SEAL:S · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 803 803 measure associated · 58.7% 90% set: measure associated / core slot / quantity like ICIT / 705 705 core slot · 71.9% 90% set: core slot / quantity like / measure associated / opening slot ICIT / 033 033 quantity like · 85.9% 90% set: quantity like / core slot ICIT / 740 740 closing slot · 76.4% 90% set: closing slot / core slot M-308 / line 1 ↗ Mohenjo-daro · SEAL:S · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 727 727 quantity like · 61.0% 90% set: quantity like / opening slot / core slot ICIT / 220 220 measure associated · 99.8% 90% set: measure associated Source normalization, damaged records, rare signs, and researcher-defined priors limit interpretation. Methods and falsification tests ↗