← Back to the atlas CATALOGUE REPRESENTATION 111 Authentic glyph asset not available
SIGN RECORD / ICIT S111
A mark.Many contexts. Contextual only · literal meaning unresolved
core slot The five-slot model favors this functional role hypothesis. Its 41.8% model mass is a preference within the model, not a probability that an ancient meaning is correct.
9 occurrences / 9,311 deduplicated tokens
#128 frequency rank · ties by ID
9 0.07% of 12,910 analytic tokens
75.0% bootstrap stability / 24 refits
Where it appears 0 — 100%
beginning 11.11%
1 of 9 non-solo occurrences middle 55.56%
5 of 9 non-solo occurrences end 33.33%
3 of 9 non-solo occurrences 0 solo occurrences excluded from positional rates. Exact strings deduplicated. Five possible roles 0 — 100%
Sign-level model mass, normalized to one. No gold-standard semantic labels exist. All five alternatives are shown. The published 90% credible sets are occurrence-level; inspect the token records below rather than treating a sign-level score as a contextual credible set.
Common left neighbors Adjacent pairs in deduplicated strings, normalized order.
Common right neighbors Adjacent pairs in deduplicated strings, normalized order.
Across objects and sites 9 distinct artifacts across 4 recorded sites. Counts below are analytic lines containing this sign; repeated inscriptions remain included.
Sites Nausharo 3 lines
Harappa 2 lines
Lothal 2 lines
Mohenjo-daro 2 lines
Artifact types SEAL:S 7 lines
POT:T:g 1 lines
TAG:P 1 lines
In the inscription First 8 matching analytic lines in catalogue order. These are examples, not a representative sample.
542.1 / line 1 ↗ Harappa · POT:T:g · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 111 111 core slot · 64.9% 90% set: core slot / measure associated H-513 / line 1 ↗ Harappa · SEAL:S · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 528 528 opening slot · 62.8% 90% set: opening slot / quantity like / core slot ICIT / 833 833 core slot · 66.7% 90% set: core slot / measure associated / quantity like / opening slot L-26 / line 1 ↗ Lothal · SEAL:S · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 166 166 opening slot · 78.2% 90% set: opening slot / core slot ICIT / 111 111 core slot · 75.3% 90% set: core slot / measure associated / opening slot ICIT / 240 240 measure associated · 98.8% 90% set: measure associated ICIT / 798 798 core slot · 80.9% 90% set: core slot / measure associated ICIT / 740 740 closing slot · 77.2% 90% set: closing slot / core slot L-218 / line 1 ↗ Lothal · TAG:P · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 111 111 core slot · 54.4% 90% set: core slot / opening slot / measure associated ICIT / 590 590 core slot · 75.7% 90% set: core slot / measure associated / closing slot ICIT / 317 317 closing slot · 79.7% 90% set: closing slot / core slot M-67 / line 2 ↗ Mohenjo-daro · SEAL:S · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 575 575 core slot · 66.3% 90% set: core slot / opening slot / quantity like ICIT / 111 111 core slot · 85.3% 90% set: core slot / measure associated ICIT / 900 900 closing slot · 63.1% 90% set: closing slot / quantity like ICIT / 165 165 closing slot · 58.2% 90% set: closing slot / measure associated / core slot ICIT / 740 740 closing slot · 88.5% 90% set: closing slot / core slot M-95 / line 1 ↗ Mohenjo-daro · SEAL:S · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 165 165 opening slot · 77.7% 90% set: opening slot / core slot / measure associated ICIT / 111 111 opening slot · 51.5% 90% set: opening slot / core slot / quantity like ICIT / 390 390 measure associated · 50.0% 90% set: measure associated / closing slot / core slot Ns-56 / line 1 ↗ Nausharo · SEAL:S · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 250 250 opening slot · 85.8% 90% set: opening slot / quantity like ICIT / 111 111 core slot · 65.0% 90% set: core slot / measure associated Ns-53 / line 1 ↗ Nausharo · SEAL:S · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 391 391 core slot · 68.4% 90% set: core slot / measure associated ICIT / 111 111 core slot · 85.6% 90% set: core slot / measure associated Source normalization, damaged records, rare signs, and researcher-defined priors limit interpretation. Methods and falsification tests ↗