INDUSTHE UNREAD ARCHIVERESEARCH EDITION / 01
← Back to the atlas
CATALOGUE REPRESENTATION918Authentic glyph asset not available

SIGN RECORD / ICIT S918

A mark.
Many contexts.

Contextual only · literal meaning unresolved

opening slot

The five-slot model favors this functional role hypothesis. Its 63.7% model mass is a preference within the model, not a probability that an ancient meaning is correct.

1occurrences / 9,311 deduplicated tokens
#596frequency rank · ties by ID
10.01% of 12,910 analytic tokens
100.0%bootstrap stability / 24 refits

Where it appears

0 — 100%
beginning100.00%
1 of 1 non-solo occurrences
middle0.00%
0 of 1 non-solo occurrences
end0.00%
0 of 1 non-solo occurrences
0 solo occurrences excluded from positional rates. Exact strings deduplicated.

Five possible roles

0 — 100%
opening slot63.74%
quantity like8.71%
measure associated9.46%
core slot9.61%
closing slot8.48%
Sign-level model mass, normalized to one. No gold-standard semantic labels exist.

All five alternatives are shown. The published 90% credible sets are occurrence-level; inspect the token records below rather than treating a sign-level score as a contextual credible set.

Common left neighbors

Adjacent pairs in deduplicated strings, normalized order.

No observed left neighbor.

Common right neighbors

Adjacent pairs in deduplicated strings, normalized order.

Across objects and sites

1 distinct artifacts across 1 recorded sites. Counts below are analytic lines containing this sign; repeated inscriptions remain included.

Sites

Artifact types

In the inscription

First 1 matching analytic lines in catalogue order. These are examples, not a representative sample.

H-150 / line 1 ↗

Harappa · SEAL:R · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string

ICIT / 918918opening slot · 71.7%90% set: opening slot / core slot / quantity like
ICIT / 740740closing slot · 70.4%90% set: closing slot / core slot / measure associated
ICIT / 063063closing slot · 81.4%90% set: closing slot / core slot

Source normalization, damaged records, rare signs, and researcher-defined priors limit interpretation. Methods and falsification tests ↗