← Back to the atlas CATALOGUE REPRESENTATION 752 Authentic glyph asset not available
SIGN RECORD / ICIT S752
A mark.Many contexts. Gold · literal meaning unresolved
core slot The five-slot model favors this functional role hypothesis. Its 64.6% model mass is a preference within the model, not a probability that an ancient meaning is correct.
17 occurrences / 9,311 deduplicated tokens
#89 frequency rank · ties by ID
49 0.38% of 12,910 analytic tokens
100.0% bootstrap stability / 24 refits
Where it appears 0 — 100%
beginning 5.88%
1 of 17 non-solo occurrences middle 94.12%
16 of 17 non-solo occurrences end 0.00%
0 of 17 non-solo occurrences 0 solo occurrences excluded from positional rates. Exact strings deduplicated. Five possible roles 0 — 100%
Sign-level model mass, normalized to one. No gold-standard semantic labels exist. All five alternatives are shown. The published 90% credible sets are occurrence-level; inspect the token records below rather than treating a sign-level score as a contextual credible set.
Common left neighbors Adjacent pairs in deduplicated strings, normalized order.
Common right neighbors Adjacent pairs in deduplicated strings, normalized order.
Across objects and sites 49 distinct artifacts across 2 recorded sites. Counts below are analytic lines containing this sign; repeated inscriptions remain included.
Sites Mohenjo-daro 38 lines
Harappa 11 lines
Artifact types TAB:C 30 lines
TAB:B 8 lines
SEAL:S 6 lines
SEAL:R 5 lines
In the inscription First 8 matching analytic lines in catalogue order. These are examples, not a representative sample.
H-2022 / line 1 ↗ Harappa · TAB:B · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 175 175 measure associated · 58.6% 90% set: measure associated / core slot ICIT / 752 752 core slot · 88.7% 90% set: core slot / measure associated ICIT / 740 740 closing slot · 77.4% 90% set: closing slot / core slot H-2021 / line 1 ↗ Harappa · TAB:B · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 832 832 core slot · 58.7% 90% set: core slot / opening slot / quantity like ICIT / 255 255 core slot · 88.8% 90% set: core slot / measure associated ICIT / 740 740 closing slot · 77.4% 90% set: closing slot / core slot H-2021 / line 1 ↗ Harappa · TAB:B · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 415 415 quantity like · 67.2% 90% set: quantity like / core slot / opening slot ICIT / 240 240 measure associated · 99.5% 90% set: measure associated ICIT / 495 495 core slot · 81.6% 90% set: core slot / measure associated ICIT / 740 740 closing slot · 77.5% 90% set: closing slot / core slot H-1793 / line 1 ↗ Harappa · TAB:B · 5 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 240 240 measure associated · 98.7% 90% set: measure associated ICIT / 740 740 closing slot · 77.5% 90% set: closing slot / core slot H-47 / line 1 ↗ Harappa · SEAL:S · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 482 482 core slot · 80.7% 90% set: core slot / opening slot / measure associated ICIT / 752 752 core slot · 88.9% 90% set: core slot / measure associated ICIT / 740 740 closing slot · 77.3% 90% set: closing slot / core slot H-58 / line 1 ↗ Harappa · SEAL:S · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 235 235 measure associated · 98.2% 90% set: measure associated ICIT / 231 231 core slot · 80.7% 90% set: core slot / measure associated ICIT / 740 740 closing slot · 47.7% 90% set: closing slot / core slot ICIT / 468 468 core slot · 55.7% 90% set: core slot / measure associated / closing slot ICIT / 806 806 core slot · 72.7% 90% set: core slot / measure associated ICIT / 158 158 closing slot · 73.6% 90% set: closing slot / core slot H-199 / line 1 ↗ Harappa · TAB:B · 5 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 240 240 measure associated · 98.7% 90% set: measure associated ICIT / 740 740 closing slot · 77.5% 90% set: closing slot / core slot H-200 / line 1 ↗ Harappa · TAB:B · 5 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 240 240 measure associated · 98.7% 90% set: measure associated ICIT / 740 740 closing slot · 77.5% 90% set: closing slot / core slot Source normalization, damaged records, rare signs, and researcher-defined priors limit interpretation. Methods and falsification tests ↗