← Back to the atlas CATALOGUE REPRESENTATION 540 Authentic glyph asset not available
SIGN RECORD / ICIT S540
A mark.Many contexts. Contextual only · literal meaning unresolved
measure associated The five-slot model favors this functional role hypothesis. Its 37.4% model mass is a preference within the model, not a probability that an ancient meaning is correct.
7 occurrences / 9,311 deduplicated tokens
#165 frequency rank · ties by ID
7 0.05% of 12,910 analytic tokens
58.3% bootstrap stability / 24 refits
Where it appears 0 — 100%
beginning 28.57%
2 of 7 non-solo occurrences middle 71.43%
5 of 7 non-solo occurrences end 0.00%
0 of 7 non-solo occurrences 0 solo occurrences excluded from positional rates. Exact strings deduplicated. Five possible roles 0 — 100%
Sign-level model mass, normalized to one. No gold-standard semantic labels exist. All five alternatives are shown. The published 90% credible sets are occurrence-level; inspect the token records below rather than treating a sign-level score as a contextual credible set.
Common left neighbors Adjacent pairs in deduplicated strings, normalized order.
Common right neighbors Adjacent pairs in deduplicated strings, normalized order.
Across objects and sites 7 distinct artifacts across 3 recorded sites. Counts below are analytic lines containing this sign; repeated inscriptions remain included.
Sites Mohenjo-daro 4 lines
Harappa 2 lines
Lothal 1 lines
Artifact types SEAL:R 2 lines
SEAL:S 2 lines
TAB:B 2 lines
POT:T:s 1 lines
In the inscription First 7 matching analytic lines in catalogue order. These are examples, not a representative sample.
H-1841 / line 1 ↗ Harappa · TAB:B · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 255 255 core slot · 70.0% 90% set: core slot / opening slot / quantity like ICIT / 204 204 core slot · 84.7% 90% set: core slot / measure associated ICIT / 540 540 core slot · 71.8% 90% set: core slot / measure associated / closing slot ICIT / 740 740 closing slot · 79.0% 90% set: closing slot / core slot H-1667 / line 1 ↗ Harappa · SEAL:S · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 540 540 measure associated · 61.5% 90% set: measure associated / core slot ICIT / 740 740 closing slot · 76.9% 90% set: closing slot / core slot L-112 / line 1 ↗ Lothal · SEAL:R · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 590 590 core slot · 35.8% 90% set: core slot / opening slot / quantity like ICIT / 540 540 core slot · 39.2% 90% set: core slot / quantity like / opening slot / measure associated ICIT / 605 605 measure associated · 59.6% 90% set: measure associated / core slot ICIT / 740 740 closing slot · 76.4% 90% set: closing slot / core slot M-393 / line 1 ↗ Mohenjo-daro · SEAL:R · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 540 540 opening slot · 66.3% 90% set: opening slot / quantity like / core slot ICIT / 806 806 measure associated · 45.2% 90% set: measure associated / quantity like / core slot ICIT / 240 240 measure associated · 99.3% 90% set: measure associated ICIT / 017 017 core slot · 85.5% 90% set: core slot / measure associated ICIT / 740 740 closing slot · 86.3% 90% set: closing slot / core slot M-481 / line 1 ↗ Mohenjo-daro · TAB:B · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 540 540 core slot · 58.9% 90% set: core slot / opening slot / measure associated ICIT / 803 803 core slot · 79.0% 90% set: core slot / measure associated ICIT / 740 740 closing slot · 66.1% 90% set: closing slot / core slot ICIT / 103 103 closing slot · 61.8% 90% set: closing slot / core slot M-1088 / line 1 ↗ Mohenjo-daro · SEAL:S · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 540 540 measure associated · 61.5% 90% set: measure associated / core slot ICIT / 740 740 closing slot · 76.9% 90% set: closing slot / core slot M-1379 / line 1 ↗ Mohenjo-daro · POT:T:s · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 920 920 opening slot · 80.2% 90% set: opening slot / core slot ICIT / 540 540 core slot · 62.0% 90% set: core slot / measure associated / closing slot ICIT / 740 740 closing slot · 77.3% 90% set: closing slot / core slot Source normalization, damaged records, rare signs, and researcher-defined priors limit interpretation. Methods and falsification tests ↗