← Back to the atlas CATALOGUE REPRESENTATION 406 Authentic glyph asset not available
SIGN RECORD / ICIT S406
A mark.Many contexts. Contextual only · literal meaning unresolved
core slot The five-slot model favors this functional role hypothesis. Its 46.0% model mass is a preference within the model, not a probability that an ancient meaning is correct.
9 occurrences / 9,311 deduplicated tokens
#133 frequency rank · ties by ID
9 0.07% of 12,910 analytic tokens
50.0% bootstrap stability / 24 refits
Where it appears 0 — 100%
beginning 22.22%
2 of 9 non-solo occurrences middle 44.44%
4 of 9 non-solo occurrences end 33.33%
3 of 9 non-solo occurrences 0 solo occurrences excluded from positional rates. Exact strings deduplicated. Five possible roles 0 — 100%
Sign-level model mass, normalized to one. No gold-standard semantic labels exist. All five alternatives are shown. The published 90% credible sets are occurrence-level; inspect the token records below rather than treating a sign-level score as a contextual credible set.
Common left neighbors Adjacent pairs in deduplicated strings, normalized order.
Common right neighbors Adjacent pairs in deduplicated strings, normalized order.
Across objects and sites 8 distinct artifacts across 3 recorded sites. Counts below are analytic lines containing this sign; repeated inscriptions remain included.
Sites Mohenjo-daro 5 lines
Lothal 2 lines
Harappa 1 lines
Artifact types SEAL:S 5 lines
POT:T:g 1 lines
SEAL 1 lines
SEAL:R 1 lines
In the inscription First 8 matching analytic lines in catalogue order. These are examples, not a representative sample.
H-50 / line 1 ↗ Harappa · SEAL:S · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 125 125 core slot · 62.7% 90% set: core slot / opening slot / quantity like ICIT / 406 406 core slot · 84.2% 90% set: core slot / measure associated ICIT / 590 590 core slot · 86.9% 90% set: core slot / measure associated ICIT / 740 740 closing slot · 82.1% 90% set: closing slot / core slot L-28 / line 1 ↗ Lothal · SEAL:S · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 920 920 opening slot · 78.1% 90% set: opening slot / core slot ICIT / 590 590 core slot · 87.4% 90% set: core slot / measure associated ICIT / 740 740 closing slot · 82.1% 90% set: closing slot / core slot L-37 / line 1 ↗ Lothal · SEAL:S · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 406 406 core slot · 56.0% 90% set: core slot / opening slot / quantity like ICIT / 390 390 closing slot · 34.8% 90% set: closing slot / measure associated / core slot ICIT / 104 104 core slot · 51.7% 90% set: core slot / closing slot / measure associated M-2061 / line 1 ↗ Mohenjo-daro · POT:T:g · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 406 406 core slot · 68.2% 90% set: core slot / opening slot / measure associated M-1961 / line 1 ↗ Mohenjo-daro · SEAL · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 072 072 measure associated · 50.7% 90% set: measure associated / core slot M-170 / line 1 ↗ Mohenjo-daro · SEAL:S · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 741 741 quantity like · 60.6% 90% set: quantity like / core slot / opening slot ICIT / 070 070 core slot · 54.3% 90% set: core slot / measure associated / quantity like ICIT / 061 061 core slot · 72.2% 90% set: core slot / measure associated ICIT / 740 740 closing slot · 78.8% 90% set: closing slot / core slot M-848 / line 1 ↗ Mohenjo-daro · SEAL:S · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 176 176 core slot · 71.0% 90% set: core slot / measure associated / opening slot ICIT / 125 125 core slot · 87.1% 90% set: core slot / measure associated M-1350 / line 1 ↗ Mohenjo-daro · SEAL:R · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string
ICIT / 320 320 core slot · 64.2% 90% set: core slot / opening slot / quantity like ICIT / 803 803 core slot · 74.1% 90% set: core slot / measure associated ICIT / 415 415 core slot · 75.9% 90% set: core slot / quantity like / measure associated ICIT / 220 220 measure associated · 99.0% 90% set: measure associated ICIT / 371 371 core slot · 77.9% 90% set: core slot / measure associated Source normalization, damaged records, rare signs, and researcher-defined priors limit interpretation. Methods and falsification tests ↗