INDUSTHE UNREAD ARCHIVERESEARCH EDITION / 01
← Back to the atlas
CATALOGUE REPRESENTATION311Authentic glyph asset not available

SIGN RECORD / ICIT S311

A mark.
Many contexts.

Contextual only · literal meaning unresolved

opening slot

The five-slot model favors this functional role hypothesis. Its 40.3% model mass is a preference within the model, not a probability that an ancient meaning is correct.

1occurrences / 9,311 deduplicated tokens
#457frequency rank · ties by ID
10.01% of 12,910 analytic tokens
100.0%bootstrap stability / 24 refits

Where it appears

0 — 100%
beginning0.00%
0 of 1 non-solo occurrences
middle100.00%
1 of 1 non-solo occurrences
end0.00%
0 of 1 non-solo occurrences
0 solo occurrences excluded from positional rates. Exact strings deduplicated.

Five possible roles

0 — 100%
opening slot40.29%
quantity like12.76%
measure associated15.97%
core slot21.72%
closing slot9.26%
Sign-level model mass, normalized to one. No gold-standard semantic labels exist.

All five alternatives are shown. The published 90% credible sets are occurrence-level; inspect the token records below rather than treating a sign-level score as a contextual credible set.

Common left neighbors

Adjacent pairs in deduplicated strings, normalized order.

Common right neighbors

Adjacent pairs in deduplicated strings, normalized order.

Across objects and sites

1 distinct artifacts across 1 recorded sites. Counts below are analytic lines containing this sign; repeated inscriptions remain included.

Sites

Artifact types

In the inscription

First 1 matching analytic lines in catalogue order. These are examples, not a representative sample.

M-9 / line 1 ↗

Mohenjo-daro · SEAL:S · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string

ICIT / 745745opening slot · 49.4%90% set: opening slot / quantity like / core slot
ICIT / 311311opening slot · 40.5%90% set: opening slot / quantity like / core slot / measure associated
ICIT / 031031quantity like · 85.7%90% set: quantity like / core slot

Source normalization, damaged records, rare signs, and researcher-defined priors limit interpretation. Methods and falsification tests ↗