INDUSTHE UNREAD ARCHIVERESEARCH EDITION / 01
← Back to the atlas
CATALOGUE REPRESENTATION268Authentic glyph asset not available

SIGN RECORD / ICIT S268

A mark.
Many contexts.

Contextual only · literal meaning unresolved

measure associated

The five-slot model favors this functional role hypothesis. Its 36.5% model mass is a preference within the model, not a probability that an ancient meaning is correct.

3occurrences / 9,311 deduplicated tokens
#266frequency rank · ties by ID
30.02% of 12,910 analytic tokens
56.5%bootstrap stability / 24 refits

Where it appears

0 — 100%
beginning0.00%
0 of 3 non-solo occurrences
middle100.00%
3 of 3 non-solo occurrences
end0.00%
0 of 3 non-solo occurrences
0 solo occurrences excluded from positional rates. Exact strings deduplicated.

Five possible roles

0 — 100%
opening slot12.39%
quantity like10.69%
measure associated36.46%
core slot34.38%
closing slot6.08%
Sign-level model mass, normalized to one. No gold-standard semantic labels exist.

All five alternatives are shown. The published 90% credible sets are occurrence-level; inspect the token records below rather than treating a sign-level score as a contextual credible set.

Common left neighbors

Adjacent pairs in deduplicated strings, normalized order.

Common right neighbors

Adjacent pairs in deduplicated strings, normalized order.

Across objects and sites

3 distinct artifacts across 2 recorded sites. Counts below are analytic lines containing this sign; repeated inscriptions remain included.

Sites

Artifact types

In the inscription

First 3 matching analytic lines in catalogue order. These are examples, not a representative sample.

M-2078 / line 1 ↗

Mohenjo-daro · BNGL · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string

ICIT / 326326opening slot · 72.6%90% set: opening slot / core slot
ICIT / 252252core slot · 68.0%90% set: core slot / quantity like / measure associated
ICIT / 268268core slot · 70.5%90% set: core slot / measure associated
ICIT / 360360core slot · 72.3%90% set: core slot / closing slot

Source normalization, damaged records, rare signs, and researcher-defined priors limit interpretation. Methods and falsification tests ↗