INDUSTHE UNREAD ARCHIVERESEARCH EDITION / 01
← Back to the atlas
CATALOGUE REPRESENTATION050Authentic glyph asset not available

SIGN RECORD / ICIT S050

A mark.
Many contexts.

Contextual only · literal meaning unresolved

core slot

The five-slot model favors this functional role hypothesis. Its 38.4% model mass is a preference within the model, not a probability that an ancient meaning is correct.

Download record JSON ↓
1occurrences / 9,311 deduplicated tokens
#394frequency rank · ties by ID
10.01% of 12,910 analytic tokens
100.0%bootstrap stability / 24 refits

Where it appears

0 — 100%
beginning0.00%
0 of 1 non-solo occurrences
middle100.00%
1 of 1 non-solo occurrences
end0.00%
0 of 1 non-solo occurrences
0 solo occurrences excluded from positional rates. Exact strings deduplicated.

Five possible roles

0 — 100%
opening slot18.61%
quantity like16.75%
measure associated15.83%
core slot38.42%
closing slot10.39%
Sign-level model mass, normalized to one. No gold-standard semantic labels exist.

All five alternatives are shown. The published 90% credible sets are occurrence-level; inspect the token records below rather than treating a sign-level score as a contextual credible set.

Common left neighbors

Adjacent pairs in deduplicated strings, normalized order.

Common right neighbors

Adjacent pairs in deduplicated strings, normalized order.

Across objects and sites

1 distinct artifacts across 1 recorded sites. Counts below are analytic lines containing this sign; repeated inscriptions remain included.

Sites

Chandigarh1 lines

Artifact types

POT:T:g1 lines

In the inscription

First 1 matching analytic lines in catalogue order. These are examples, not a representative sample.

Ch-2 / line 1 ↗

Chandigarh · POT:T:g · 1 occurrence(s) of this exact string

ICIT / 705705core slot · 70.3%90% set: core slot / opening slot / quantity like
ICIT / 050050core slot · 69.0%90% set: core slot / closing slot / measure associated
ICIT / 740740closing slot · 80.3%90% set: closing slot / core slot

Source normalization, damaged records, rare signs, and researcher-defined priors limit interpretation. Methods and falsification tests ↗